I've mentioned before that my gripe with this system is that any healthcare professional in the system can access information. Now everyone I work with, and approximately 10% of my neighbors (wild guess here), and even some of my patients, have access to this system. The only thing that stops someone from looking up a friend's medical history is the knowledge that you will get in trouble-- and likely fired-- if you get caught. But you have to get caught, which means that someone has to look up who accessed the information and track down if it was a legitimate accessing of information. Now they do it, and people have been fired, and the prohibition is real, but we don't think that in a system of many thousands of people, there isn't a sociopath here or there?
Let me give you an theoretical example: what if a young nurse (he has access) starts dating a pretty young hospital worker (she does not have access to the records; also these people can be old and/or ugly if you'd like....just enjoying my fiction here). He's curious about her; in fact, he's prone to a bit of pathological jealousy. He decides to take his chances and look up her records and he notices that someone has run an HIV test on her (it was negative) and she's had a miscarriage a couple of years ago, one she never mentioned to him. Oh, and psych records aren't in the system (yet, coming soon) but her primary care doc mentioned that she's on Prozac for depression and Seroquel for sleep. Isn't Seroquel the big guns, maybe she's crazy. So if he tells her he looked at her records, and she wants to report him, he's toast. But maybe she doesn't want to get him fired, so she eats it. Also, once he's fired, he's just fired, not dead. He can then tell whoever he likes, I suppose, especially if he loses his license. And the saying goes that there are random "flags" that go up to catch wrong-doers, but this is a big system, so I am skeptical.
I've mentioned my concern about this to a few people, especially since the system is about to be overhauled. I've suggested that each patient have a card or an identifier that the provider should get from the patient to authorize access to the information. I've asked that this be brought up at planning meetings. I get looks like I'm from Mars. Obviously, all health care providers should have access to their patient's records, and in this system, there is no absolute guarantee that your neighbor won't be curious and you don't have the right to not tell the dermatologist that you had a vasectomy three years ago, or to keep your internist from making a note that your antibiotic was started in jail. Okay, I will say that all of the records I've read (it's been years, that's a lot) are very professional, but still, sometimes the facts are the facts and they aren't all that savory. I asked if the topic came up at the planning meeting and was told no one else was concerned. My boss has agreed with me that I watch too much 24.
So I went to schedule a routine screening exam the other day. I have no reason to be concerned about this, but I am generally uneasy about being in the massive data bank that is the system's records and I avoid it. I called for the appointment, and the office had been taken over by my hospital system, something new! I asked if my results would go into the main hospital computer. Of course they will! Thank you, I said, I will get my test elsewhere, and I hung up.
Why doesn't anyone else care about this stuff?